Thursday; October 15

I do my best to stay clear of political biases in our daily observations, but periodically there are current events that capture my interest. The other day I read a portion of the statement Amy Coney Barrett sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee and came across an interesting statement. In citing a major influence in her life, Justice Antonin Scalia, she noted, “His judicial philosophy was straightforward: A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were. Sometimes that approach meant reaching results that he did not like. But as he put it in one of his best known opinions, that is what it means to say we have a government of laws, not of men.”. Now, before we go any future, please understand that I am not promoting a debate about either Justice Scalia or Judge Barrett; nor am I comparing the laws of the United States with the Bible, but when I read that it got me to thinking about our approach to Scripture. When it comes to interpreting the Bible, do we look at it through the pure and perfect Word of God or are we looking at it the way we would like it to be? We all know that God’s law is infallible as it is written, but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t times when promoting our opinions wouldn’t be easier for us than applying the Word of God. However, when we start picking and choosing our “truths” we are going to come up with mere opinion rather than perfect religion.

Let’s let the Word of God speak for itself. We cannot improve upon perfection and when we try we are apt to ruin ourselves and wreck those who listen to us.
Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

Thursday; January 12

Monday; September 25