Friday; October 4

In the parable we call the Good Samaritan Jesus tells the story of man who was beaten, robbed and left for dead.  Three individuals encountered the man in his traumatic state:  a priest, a Levite and a common ordinary Samaritan.  The priest and the Levite passed by the man without helping him (I am sure they had important things to do), but the Samaritan took the time to care for his immediate needs and guaranteed help for the future.  In driving home the point, Jesus asked the “no-brainer” question, “Which of these three do you think proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell into the robbers’ hands?” (Luke 10:36).   Even the most unobservant person in the audience would have had to vote for the Samaritan.  What was the difference between these men?  It wasn’t pedigree, job description or knowledge – the thing that set the Samaritan apart was his willingness to act.  He put His good will into action.
Have you noticed how much discussion there is these days about social issues?  Whether it is homelessness, violence, poverty, bigotry or whatever else, there are a lot of things in our world that need attention.  The question is are we willing to get involved?  Are we willing to “do” something?  Sure, it is easy to study the problems or criticize the lack of resources; but the only thing that really matters is our willingness to take action.  It is easy to debate whether this should be a community, church or political problem; but until we are willing to intervene we are no better than the priest and the Levite (who are either footnotes or villains to the story).
I don’t know if we will ever really find the definitive answer to what ails our society, but we can do what we can do.   Let’s not be guilty of walking by people in their time of distress; let’s walk with them in their hour of need.
          Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more