Friday; October 11

Last week, the Washington Post published an article entitled, “If the president is doing it ...’:  How Trump took swearing mainstream”.  The article sets out to make a couple of points.  The first one is to explain the rationale media outlets are using to justify publishing words that just a few years ago would have been considered unpublishable.  Modern media seems to have made the decision to publish “naughty words” if they are attributable to the president and national or international leaders.  To back up their claims they point out that our nation’s leaders have brought swearing out of the dark and are allowing it to be heard and seen in the light of day.  Another issue broached was which came first:  leaders bringing these words out in to the public or the changing mores that allowed these phrases to become publicly acceptable?  Today’s modern politicians are not the first ones to have potty-mouths, but they seem to be less restrained and more quoted.
Over the last few months there has been a push to promote the concept that words have meanings.  While the original emphasis was that racially-charged words can hurt, there is another lesson in this comment.  When our society allows vulgarity to be plastered all over our news outlets and social media we are bound to lower our moral thresholds.  When we allow our language to deteriorate will our values be too far behind it?  If we accept these words as being mainstream, who is to say that the thoughts behind them won’t become tolerated?  These words create a base environment where anger, hate, immorality and a lack of moral decency are more easily accepted.
Let’s live by the warning, “Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear.” (Ephesians 4:29).  Maybe we do need a language police.  Let’s not say these things ourselves nor accept them without challenging them in public – at least not by people we expect to be leaders. 
          Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Thursday; May 3

I have a fish tank that allows my three Bettas (Larry, Darrell and Darrell) to live in the same structure, but remain hidden from each other – well sort of.   When I go to feed the fish, I believe that one of the Darrell’s can sort of see that the other Darrell is getting fed and he will linger over on that side of the tank even after I put his food in his tank.   I have to tap on the side of the tank where his food is floating to help him refocus and eat.   I get the impression that he is so interested in what is going on in the other Darrell’s tank that he can’t enjoy his own food. I have been told that the brain of a fish is pretty small – which explains their inability to process “blessings”, but are we guilty of the same malady as Darrell?   Are we so worried (or consumed) by what happens to the people around us that we fail to realize what is going on with us?   Are we envious of the blessings that others are receiving and end up missing out on what we have been given?   Are w
Read more

Thursday; February 14

         While most of us are familiar with today being Valentine’s Day, there are some who actually refer to February 14 th as “St. Valentine’s Day”.  This title is often affixed to a criminally historic event known as “The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre” on February 14, 1929 in Chicago, but that is another story for another time.  Not knowing much about the history of “Saint Valentine” I did a little research and found out he was a Roman religious leader who was martyred in 269 AD.  According to my limited research Valentine was killed because of his encouragement of Roman men (especially soldiers) to marry which was in violation of Claudias’ edict that prohibited marriage to keep their minds singularly focused on their task of defending the Empire.  Somehow, from this beginning – and possibly embellished by Chaucer – St. Valentine became intertwined with the concept of romantic love.           I am not really sure how February 14 th became connected with love, but inspired by thi
Read more

Wednesday; December 6

What does it mean to be a leader? I subscribe to the belief that a leader is someone who seeks the best for others and works with them to achieve their potential. There are others; however, who define leadership as the ability to have a vision and the tenacity to get their own way. Leaders who are this way are often portrayed as having developed the maturity to manipulate people to do things their way. However, is the ability to drive people in our direction mature or is it childish? The Christians of the 1st Century came from a lot of different backgrounds and had to work hard to work together. As the Apostle Paul challenged Christians in the city of Ephesus he challenged them to accept individual differences, “… until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ. “ (Ephesians 4:13). Bossiness was not to be viewed as a sign of maturity, a willingness to wo
Read more