Tuesday; July 9

I have been reading the book “Unoffendable” by Brant Hanson which has challenged me to rethink some of my previously held beliefs about letting go of anger (and even disappointment) in hopes of being more open to deeper relationships with people.  Another aspect of the book which intrigued me was Hanson’s observation about Jesus’ perception of people. In essence the author encouraged us to take a new look at people based upon Jesus’ honest assessment of them.  Jesus was not surprised by what people did because He saw them as they really were.  In fact, the Bible provides this glimpse into Jesus’ insight, “Now when He was in Jerusalem at the Passover, during the feast, many believed in His name, observing His signs which He was doing.  But Jesus, on His part, was not entrusting Himself to them, for He knew all men,  and because He did not need anyone to testify concerning man, for He Himself knew what was in man.” (John 2:23-25).  Neither John nor Hanson seem to advocate that Jesus was cynical; rather they appear to note that Jesus accepted people as their fallible selves and by doing so, He was able to work with them without being offended, angry or hurt.
Are we seeing people for who they really are or are we setting them too high on a pedestal from which they are bound to fall and which will cause us to be disappointed?  People (especially those who don’t have a spiritual nature) will make decisions that are going to be contrary to God’s will – why should that surprise us?  Honestly, the surprising thing is that we would expect carnal people to act in spiritual ways.  When we assume this, we are bound to be disappointed.  Again, the point isn’t to constantly think the worst of people so they won’t let us down, rather it is keep open eyes and an open mind so that we can deal with them where they are. 
          Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more