Thursday; July 27

In a modern discussion of traitors among United States citizens two people are apt to come to the forefront:  Judas and Benedict Arnold.  Benedict Arnold was a military leader in the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War who would eventually change sides and command some of the British Forces.  Among the theories presented for his actions, one of the most prolific seems to be his ego – he felt underappreciated by his contemporaries. 
No one will know for certain when and why he decided to change sides, but his discouragement seems to be present as early as 1776 when he wrote to another Continental general, “The drafts from the regiments at Ticonderoga are a miserable set; indeed the men on board the fleet, in general, are not equal to half their number of good men.” and “We have a wretched motley crew, in the fleet; the marines the refuse of every regiment, and the seamen, few of them, ever wet with salt water.”  These observations might be true, but in light of his future actions it almost seems like he is setting his warriors (and himself) up for discouragement at best and failure at worst.
As I thought about Arnold I wondered how many of us have unintentionally set our course by speaking evil of those we should be defending?  When we make disparaging comments about a co-worker, a family member or a fellow Christian we set in motion direct and indirect efforts that can be used erode their influence and their momentum.  Our words might actually give their adversaries insight into how they can be overcome, but if nothing else they set a negative tone that might destroy or discourage them.
What are we saying about the people closest to us?  Even if it is the truth, is it in their best interest as they go out each and every day to fight their battles and defend their good name?
Think about it!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more