Monday; September 19

Are you a “fan”, “supporter” or “disinterested”?

The other day, I got to thinking about sports fans and figured that I could fit most of them into one of three categories. There are some people who just aren’t interested at all. There are people who are supporters of one particular team. They are fanatical in their support of their team, but outside of that, they really aren’t all that interested in other teams. Then there are fans who not only follow their team, they also know about the other teams in the league. They are familiar with standings, statistics and the progress of the sport. So, which are you?

The reason I bring this up isn’t necessarily to discuss a particular sport, rather it is to ask if you have ever thought about how it applies to religion? There are people who have little to no interest in spiritual things. There are others who are very tuned into their particular type of faith – either as broad as Christianity as a whole or as focused as their denomination or their congregation. Finally, there are people who follow all kinds of religions and are interested in how theirs fits within the greater scheme of things. An understanding of this approach to religion is important when it comes to how we go about discussing it. Understanding what interests us is vital, but what may be just as important is measuring the interests of others. We can become frustrated discussing our church when the other person wants to debate religious philosophy. Approaching disinterested people can create animosity when it is done by people who are engaged in their own spiritual journey.

Before beginning a discussion of religion, it would probably serve us well to get a handle on the other person’s perspective. When we understand them, we are more apt to connect with them.

Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more