Tuesday; February 8

In our time together yesterday, we took a look at how we must understand that it isn’t enough to just stop doing evil, we must be willing to replace it with good. Cleaning house is a good first step, but unless we fill the void with something productive, we run the risk of becoming worse than we before. There are times when it is important to stop behaviors to move toward growth, but unless we follow-up with something appropriate, our old ways might return – and they might even be worse than before. Several years ago, communities followed the “broken windows philosophy” which advocated that we needed to get rid of the unsightly elements of our dilapidated areas. While this makes sense – people are less likely to commit crimes or acts of immorality in clean and kempt areas – there is a limited window of opportunity to do something positive with these areas or they will begin to resume deteriorating. Just as this is true in our physical structures, it is the same in our social areas. COVID-related cancellations served a purpose early on, but unless we find a way to restore a sense of community, the temptation to be self-serving begins to pull us away from others. There may be places where the justice system might need to be altered, but unless we replace what we dismantle with something better, injustice or anarchy is apt to follow. There was a need to re-evaluate our school systems in light of what has been going on, but unless we fill that void with quality education our students’ grades and behavior are bound to suffer.

Let’s not be happy to merely dismantle those things that need to be changed, let’s make sure we rebuild them better than they were before. This is where true atrophy ends and growth begins.

Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more