Friday; December 18

It was on this date in 1917 that the 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed and sent to the states for ratification. For those of you who might not remember, the 18th Amendment ushered in Prohibition. For the next several years, much of the use of alcohol was regulated by the government. This created quite a stir until it was repealed by the 21st Amendment on December 5, 1933.
While you might look at the preceding paragraph and think we are going to be talking about alcohol, I want to take this in a bit of different direction and talk about influence. The Prohibition Era brought together two viable (and powerful) influences: government and social morality. The decade and a half challenged the limits of government and the power of the people. As I look back on this footnote in our nation’s history a couple of things come to mind:
First, government legislation can’t make something either “right” or “wrong”. Sure, it can make things “legal” and “illegal” (and according to Romans 13 that does have an influence on how Christians should behave), but basic righteousness is not up to the power of the State, it has been predetermined by the power of God.
Second, society can’t make something either “right” or “wrong”. In just a couple decades the perceived will of the people on alcohol use did a pendulum swing between what we should and shouldn’t do. I am sure there were a lot of influences at work in shaping opinions, which goes to show us that society is not a good judge of absolute morality. If we are looking for consistency, it is the Word of God that will keep us firmly on the straight and narrow.
The government and society both exercise influence in our lives – that is to be expected and, at times, appreciated. However, let’s never lose sight of the true guide in our lives – the will of the Lord.
Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more