Tuesday; January 28

          In 2003 Dan Brown published a book entitled The Da Vinci Code that hit the best sellers lists.  Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that I haven’t read the book but I do know that it became so popular that there could have been some challenges in the Christian community with the book.  While the book is described as fictional mystery thriller I would imagine that, for at least some people, the book embedded some ideas that might have made it difficult to distinguish fact from fiction. 
          I hadn’t thought much about the work until I was watching a program that mentioned the influence of the book.  As I reflected on this novel I got to pondering all the other “Christian-type” books that might blur the lines between entertainment and reality.  Please do not misunderstand me, I am not advocating that we should not read fictional books, what I am saying is that would should be discerning when we read anything.  Are the books we read fiction ... opinion ... fact ... philosophy ... commentary ... non-biblical history or science?  There may not be any harm in reading as long as we understand that unless it is the Bible, it can be fallible.
          When we accept the authority of the Bible, we must assess all other books in light of the pure and perfect Word of God.  When we believe in the truth of the Bible we affirm the message of the Apostle Paul, “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!  As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!” (Galatians 1:8-9).  It is okay to enjoy some good books, but let’s never let them override the Good Book!
         Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more