Tuesday; January 21

          I recently read a headline about a certain extra-curricular activity being criticized for not being (or doing) enough to help prevent suicide.  No, I didn’t read the article, but it did cause me to think about who or what we blame for suicide.  I realize that the topic of suicide is typically so frightening that it has become taboo, but we – as a society – cannot ignore it.  Unfortunately, through the years, I have been around way too many suicides and there is one thing I have learned – suicide is not a simple, single-cause issue.  It is an individual’s decision that, more often than not, comes from a complex blend of stimuli.  It can’t be universally blamed on bullying … or alcohol and drugs … or depression … or limited healthcare … or financial insecurity … or any other single issue.  Each choice to end a life comes from an individual’s unique situation and personal perspective.  The same set of circumstances that might cause one person to have a bad day might be enough cause another person to seek the ultimate escape by taking their life.  There is no blanket statement that covers all suicide attempts, but one of the most common is that a person doesn’t necessarily want to end their life, often they just want the emotional hurt to stop.  When people get to this point they are typically just so emotionally overwhelmed that this permanent solution to their temporary problems seems to be a viable choice.
          I know very few people who feel comfortable discussing suicide, but with its continued presence in our community, we need to do something.  With this said, I would like to offer up some suggestions on what can be done, but I have run out of room for today.  With this in mind, I will leave you with a preview of coming information, “Bear one another’s burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ.” (Galatians 6:2).
          Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more