Wednesday; October 24

Throughout much of modern history intelligence has been touted as being an accurate measure of potential.  In essence, when we have looked for leaders, we have relied upon finding people with a high Intelligence Quotient.  Yet, recently, there has been a push to consider some of the “softer skills” in assessing leadership.  One of the first elements of this new type of assessment was Emotional Intelligence, but in the past few years others have appeared on the scene – including “Moral Intelligence”.  Doug  Lennick and Fred Kiel have done a lot of work on this topic and wrote the book Moral Intelligence.  In their book, Lennick and Kiel propose that a good leader has four basic moral qualities:  Integrity, Responsibility, Compassion and Forgiveness.  A study of these principles can break them down a bit further:
1)  Integrity:  Acting consistently with principles, values and beliefs ... Telling the truth ... Standing up for what is right ... Keeping promises
2)  Responsibility:  Taking responsibility for personal choices ... Admitting mistakes and failures ... Embracing responsibly for serving others
3)  Compassion:  Actively caring about others ... Empathy
4)  Forgiveness:  Letting go of one’s own mistakes ... Letting go of others’ mistakes
          Are we preparing ourselves to be leaders – let’s make sure that we invest as much effort into becoming better as we do into becoming smarter.  Are we looking for people to lead us – let’s look at their moral character as much as we do their academic intelligence. 
Think About It!

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday; November 29

The biblical story of the Good Samaritan has changed our world. Notice I didn’t say that it had change religion or even Christianity, it has influenced the world. There are very few people who don’t know the moral of Jesus’ parable about the Good Samaritan. In fact, the phrase has become a common description of everyday people doing good to their neighbors. While Jesus’ parable from Luke 10 shares several spiritual lessons, one of the most practical is that good can be done by anyone. You don’t have to be a church official to do good, it is not only possible for each one of us to help, it is required of all of us. If a Samaritan can be good, so can we! After presenting the parable, Jesus asked the man who had originally asked the question about being a good neighbor which character in the story was a good neighbor, “… he said, ‘The one who showed mercy toward him.’” at which point, the discussion from theoretical to personal, “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do the same.’” (Luke
Read more

Thursday; January 12

The other day I was watching a television show that used a rather common term applied to overcoming challenges. When organizations experience unexpected setbacks – especially when they lose key people – they rely upon the concept of “Next Man Up”. In essence, when our starters (or stars) go down, effective organizations rely upon their next levels to step into the vacancy. While this is an effective response, have we given much thought as to how we prepare to be the “next people up”? First, we must know our job. Even when we aren’t the primary players, we need to be preparing ourselves to be ready when we get the opportunity to shine. Second, we must do our best when we get the chance. Knowledge is important but what turns potential into talent is effort. Yet, maybe the most underappreciated aspect of this concept is a willingness avoid excuse-making and whining about the unfairness of our situation. When we complain about the circumstances that caused the need for replacements
Read more

Monday; September 25

When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about this thing called the Generation Gap. I was a little bit too young to be active in the social movements of the 1960s, but I do remember listening to the challenges the generations were experiencing way back then. Interestingly, now that I have been on both sides of the aging process, I have to admit that the Gap of the 1960s was nothing new. With the development of each generation comes conflict. The young people don’t feel like the older people understand them and the older folks tend to believe their input is being underappreciated. Too often trust is the casualty when two generations collide. The sad thing is that it doesn’t have to be this way. When we can capture the innovation and energy of the younger folks and harness the wisdom of those who have been around for a while we can develop a winning combination. No, we won’t always see things eye-to-eye nor will we necessarily speak the same emotional language, but when we app
Read more